Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels
Revisit the quarrel between "the ancients and the moderns" and reflect on human nature with Swift's Gulliver's Travels.
This two-week course explores the contributions of literature and rhetoric to the study of politics.
The first week, led by Professors Benjamin and Jenna Storey, will examine Plato’s meditation on eros in the Symposium and the natural connections between love, ambition, and fidelity to the polity. What is the relation of the love of beauty, sexual pleasure, and education to virtue? How does eros relate to moral excellence, and to moral failure? Is political ambition an extension or betrayal of the love for another human being? What exactly do we desire from erotic partnership—do lovers seek to complete themselves by merging with their “other halves,” or is love ultimately a longing for immortality that no other human being could satisfy? Peopled by political figures implicated in both the greatness and the collapse of Athens, the Symposium invites its readers to investigate the complexity of properly ordering our loves, an endeavor necessary both to fulfilling private lives and to a strong and decent public order.
The second week, led by Professor Paul Cantor, will study Shakespeare’s Roman plays to explore the interaction between man and city, each taken to its dramatic height. From classical antiquity down to the eighteenth century and such thinkers as Montesquieu and the American Founding Fathers, Rome has been one of the perennial themes of political theory. Shakespeare’s Roman plays (Coriolanus, Julius Caesar, and Antony & Cleopatra) are his contribution to the longstanding debate about Rome, and also occupy a very important place in his comprehensive understanding of the human condition. The plays are evidence of the crucial importance of politics in Shakespeare’s view of human nature, as well as of his sense of the limits of politics.
Images: Anselm Feuerbach, Plato’s Symposium, 1874 | Vincenzo Camuccini, The Death of Caesar, 1805
Paul Cantor on Shakespeare's Rome
This two-week course will take place in Washington, DC. It is a full-time commitment for Monday–Friday, with required sessions in the morning, afternoon, and some evenings.
Faculty
Benjamin Storey
Benjamin Storey is Associate Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Furman University. His interests focus on the history of political philosophy. He is currently completing a book entitled The Restless Age: Four French Thinkers on the Quest for Self-Understanding in an Unsettled Modernity.
Benjamin Storey
Benjamin Storey is Associate Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Furman University. At Furman, he is Co-Founder and Co-Director of the Tocqueville Program, which aims to revivify traditional liberal education in a modern context.
His publications have appeared in First Things, The New Atlantis, The Weekly Standard, The Claremont Review of Books, Doublethink Quarterly, The Journal of Politics, The Review of Politics, Perspectives on Political Science, and Society. He recently co-authored a book with Jenna Silber Storey entitled Why We Are Restless: On the Modern Quest for Contentment.
In 2016-2017, he was a Visiting Fellow at the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University. He is the winner of Furman’s 2016 Meritorious Teaching Award, and of the 2011 “American Scholar” Award given by Furman’s chapter of Phi Beta Kappa.
He received his MA and PhD from the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago, and his BA in History from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Jenna Silber Storey
Jenna Silber Storey is Assistant Professor in Politics and International Affairs at Furman University and Executive Director of Furman’s Tocqueville Program. She is the co-author of a book with Benjamin Storey: Why We Are Restless: On the Modern Quest for Contentment (Princeton University Press, 2021). Further information about her work can be found at www.jbstorey.com.
Jenna Silber Storey
Jenna Silber Storey is Assistant Professor in Politics and International Affairs at Furman University, and Executive Director of Furman’s Tocqueville Program, an intellectual community of students and faculty who aim to reflect on contemporary issues with a perspective informed by the study of the history of political thought. She is also a Board Member of Veritas Preparatory School in Greenville, South Carolina.
Her work has appeared in edited volumes as well as The Washington Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, First Things, realclearbooks, The New Atlantis, VoeglinView, The Weekly Standard, and The Boston Globe. She is the co-author of a book with Benjamin Storey: Why We Are Restless: On the Modern Quest for Contentment (Princeton University Press, 2021). Further information about her work can be found at www.jbstorey.com.
Dr. Storey received her PhD from the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago, where she was a John M. Olin Junior Fellow, and her B.A. from the University Professors Program at Boston University, where she also worked as Executive Assistant to the Superintendent for the Boston University-Chelsea Schools Partnership. In 2019 Dr. Storey won the Silas N. Pearman award for teaching in Furman’s first-year Engaged Living Program.
Paul Cantor
Paul Cantor is the Clifton Waller Barrett Professor of English and Comparative Literature at the University of Virginia. He has written on a wide range of subjects, including Shakespeare, Romanticism, Austrian economics, and contemporary popular culture.
Paul Cantor
Paul A. Cantor is Clifton Waller Barrett Professor of English and Comparative Literature at the University of Virginia, where he has taught since 1977.
From 1992 to 1999, Cantor served on the National Council on the Humanities, the governing board of the National Endowment for the Humanities. He has published extensively on Shakespeare, including his books Shakespeare’s Roman Trilogy (University of Chicago Press, 2017), Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire (Cornell, 1976), and the Hamlet volume in the Cambridge Landmarks of World Literature series (Cambridge University Press, 1989, 2004). He has also published essays on The Merchant of Venice, Henry V, As You Like It, Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth, King Lear, Timon of Athens, Antony and Cleopatra, and The Tempest, as well as on general issues of Shakespeare criticism.
In addition to Shakespeare, he has written about other English Renaissance dramatists, including Christopher Marlowe, Ben Jonson, Cyril Tourneur, and John Ford. Among the other fields he has worked in are British Romantic literature and American popular culture. His book Gilligan Unbound: Pop Culture in the Age of Globalization (Rowman & Littlefield, 2001) was named one of the best nonfiction books of 2001 by the Los Angeles Times. In the Fall of 2007 and 2012, Cantor was a Visiting Professor of Government at Harvard and taught a course on Shakespeare and Politics, which he also taught in the Spring of 2015.
Cantor received his BA in 1966 and his Ph.D. in 1971 from Harvard University, where he was an assistant professor of English from 1971 to 1977.
Download the Full Syllabus
Preview the Syllabus by Week/Session
Week I: Plato's Symposium
Introduction
Readings:
Discussion Questions:
- Who tells the story of Plato’s Symposium? Why does that matter?
- What is the setting of the speeches that are the focus of the work?
- Who are the characters involved in this dialogue?
- Why do these friends decide to engage in this contest of speeches?
- What does Phaedrus suggest that love is, and why does he consider it good?
- What does love have to do with the virtues necessary for political life, according to Phaedrus?
- How does Pausanias differentiate between “heavenly” and “common” love?
- Describe the various customs regarding love that Pausanias enumerates. Why does he consider the erotic customs of Athenian customs superior?
- How do erotic desire and ambition interact in Pausanias’ account of love?
- What does the ideal relation between a lover and a beloved look like on Pausanias’ account?
Eryximachus & Aristophanes
Readings:
Discussion Questions:
- How does Eryximachus change the frame of reference within which we are considering the nature of love? What does this change of perspective have to do with his argument that love needs to be governed by the art of medicine?
- How does the form of Aristophanes’ speech differ in form from the previous speeches? How does the manner in which he speaks relate to his argument about the nature of love?
- According to the story Aristophanes tells, what are the essential steps in the development of human beings as we now know them?
- What is it that lovers really desire, according to Aristophanes?
- What is the relation between love and political ambition in Aristophanes’ story? Between love and piety?
Agathon & Socrates
Readings:
Discussion Questions:
- Why does Agathon depart from the perspective taken by the previous speakers in order to talk about the character of Love? How is this new focus appropriate to who Agathon is?
- What are the attributes that Agathon ascribes to the god Eros?
- What are the argumentative steps by which Socrates convinces Agathon that he did not know what he was talking about in the speech he delivered to great applause just moments earlier?
- Why does Socrates introduce the apparently fictional Diotima into the dialogue?
- What does Diotima mean when she says that Love is a spirit that exists between the mortal and the immortal?
Diotima
Readings:
Discussion Questions:
- What is the lineage of Love, according to Diotima?
- Why, according to Diotima, do we desire the good? Why do we desire the beautiful?
- Why is pregnancy so central to Diotima’s account of love? What are the variety of ways in which one can be “pregnant”?
- In what sense might lawgiving be an erotic activity?
- What are the stages in the “rites of love” to which Diotima introduces Socrates?
- How does Diotima’s speech respond to each of the previous speeches?
Conclusion
Readings:
- Plato, Symposium, 215a-223e
- Review the Symposium in its entirety
Discussion Questions:
- Alcibiades announces on his entrance that he is “plastered.” What effect should that have on our judgment of his speech?
- What are the images Alcibiades uses to describe Socrates, and what do they tell us about him?
- How does Alcibiades’s encounter with Socrates affect his political ambition?
- Does Alcibiades’s love of Socrates make him unhappy?
- Does Socrates love Alcibiades?
- What is the significance of the conversation Socrates has with Agathon and Aristophanes after everyone else falls asleep?
- What can this dialogue, set in a strange context and a distant time, teach us about love? Political ambition? Ourselves?
Week II: Shakespeare's Rome
Coriolanus
Recommended Reading:
Shakespeare and Politics, The Great Thinkers
Readings:
Discussion Questions:
- How does Shakespeare characterize the two parties in Republican Rome, the patricians and the plebeians? The two parties are opposed in their interests, but how do they manage to communicate and to some extent work together?
- What in Coriolanus’s character causes him to fail in his bid to become consul?
- What is the understanding of immortality in republican Rome, and how does it affect the character of the Romans?
- How are the women in Coriolanus portrayed? In particular, what is Volumnia’s role in the play? What is the relation of the family to the city of Rome?
- How would you compare the Volsces with the Romans? Why is Coriolanus able to achieve rule among them, when he was not able to do so among the Romans? How would you compare Aufidius with Coriolanus?
- Why does Coriolanus eventually abandon his effort to conquer Rome?
- What do the Romans learn from the story of Coriolanus? What do the patricians in particular learn? What do the plebeians in particular learn? How will these lessons affect the future of Rome as a republic?
Julius Ceasar
Readings:
Discussion Questions:
- Compare the opening scene of Julius Caesar with that of Coriolanus. What does this comparison tell us about the changes that have occurred in the republican regime? How do the plebeians of Julius Caesar differ from those of Coriolanus? How has the role of the tribunes changed?
- In Shakespeare’s portrayal, what are the strengths and weaknesses of Julius Caesar? How has he gotten to the point where he is on the verge of achieving one-man rule in Rome?
- Why does the conspiracy form against Julius Caesar? Who are its leaders, and what does each contribute to the enterprise?
- Why does the conspiracy fail? What are some of the conspirators’ specific mistakes, and why do they make them? Could the Republic have been saved?
- What is Antony’s role in the play? Can you compare him to any character in Coriolanus? Why does he succeed in defeating the conspirators? What implications does his reaction to Caesar’s death have for his future in Antony and Cleopatra?
- How would you compare Brutus’s funeral oration with Antony’s?
- How has the status of women changed since the days of Coriolanus?
- How has religion in Rome changed since the days of Coriolanus? What does the presence of soothsayers in the play suggest?
- Cassius is a professed Epicurean; Brutus is a professed Stoic; Cicero is the only “name” philosopher to appear in any of Shakespeare’s plays. What does the presence of philosophy in the Rome of Julius Caesar suggest?
- What is the attitude toward suicide in the closing scenes of the play? Has the Roman attitude toward military victory changed?
Antony and Cleopatra
Readings:
Discussion Questions:
- How have the political circumstances changed now that the Roman Empire is coming into being? How do these changes affect the lives of the characters in the play?
- What do you make of Pompey’s rhetoric and actions in Act II, Scenes 6 and 7? How and why have the terms of politics altered for him?
- In Act III, Scene 1, we see Ventidius, a Roman commander on the frontier of the empire. What does this scene reveal about how politics has changed in Imperial Rome? What are the implications of this scene for the future of Rome?
- How has the status of women changed in the Empire?
- How has religion changed in the Empire?
- How has Rome become Egyptianized in Antony and Cleopatra? What does this development tell us about Imperial Rome?
- Antony expresses a wish to live “a private man in Athens” (Act III, Scene 12). If all that matters to him and Cleopatra is their private love affair, why don’t they simply abdicate and disappear into the teeming masses of the Empire?
- What is Enobarbus’s dilemma, and how is it representative of the changed conditions of the Empire?
- How has the notion of nobility changed in the world of Antony and Cleopatra?
- For the first time in the Roman plays, we hear talk of an afterlife in Antony and Cleopatra. What is the significance of this development?
#/media/File:Plato%27s_Symposium_-_Anselm_Feuerbach_-_Google_Cultural_Institute.jpg){kind=link}
